Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) Board decisions

The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and vision impairment were denied as there was no credible evidence linking these conditions to his military service.

The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding no evidence linking these conditions to his active service. The decision also noted that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the previously denied claims.

The Board finds that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are as likely as not related to his military service, with the onset of high frequency hearing loss during active duty. The decision grants service connection for these conditions.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, hepatitis C, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus have been denied as there is no current disability or evidence of in-service disease or injury.

The Board found no evidence of a current disability related to service connection for tinnitus and denied the claim.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's tinnitus is likely related to his noise exposure during service, and thus grants service connection for tinnitus.

The Board found that the Veteran's left ear hearing loss was not incurred or aggravated during service, and denied his claim for service connection.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's tinnitus is as likely the result of his noise exposure in service or associated with his service-connected noise-induced bilateral hearing loss, and thus grants service connection for tinnitus.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and residuals of cold injuries to the bilateral feet have all been denied as there is no current evidence of these conditions.,There is also no indication that the Veteran has PTSD.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, and bilateral tinnitus have been denied. The evidence submitted is considered new but not material to establish these conditions.

The Board finds that the Veteran's sleep apnea and tinnitus were not incurred in or aggravated by his military service. The evidence does not support a finding of continuity of symptomatology since service.

The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy and tinnitus were found to be related to his military service, with the Board granting service connection for both conditions.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are as likely as not due to exposure to acoustic trauma during his active service, granting service connection for both conditions.

The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there is no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.

The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA audiological examination to determine if tinnitus is related to service.

The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current disability of bilateral hearing loss or tinnitus related to his active service. The preponderance of evidence is against the claims.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to assess the nature and etiology of his claimed bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a videoconference hearing before the Board.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to service, and thus denied both claims.