Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
86,613 vetted Board decisions for Tinnitus (ringing in the ears).
The Board found no evidence of a nexus between the veteran's tinnitus and his military service, including noise exposure. The claim for service connection was denied.
The Board has found the veteran's account of noise exposure credible and consistent with his military service. The medical evidence confirms that he has tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss disability, which are linked to his military noise exposure. As a result, the veteran is granted service connection for these conditions.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus and granted it, finding that new evidence supports a link between the condition and his military service.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, or a sinus disability attributable to service. The evidence does not establish service connection for these conditions.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have hearing loss or tinnitus that is related to his military service, and there are no currently demonstrated fragment wound scars of the right lower extremity. The claim for these conditions was denied.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there is no evidence of a nexus between his current conditions and his military service.
The veteran's service-connected bilateral tinnitus is assigned a maximum schedular rating of 10 percent, and there is no legal basis for an increased rating.
The Board has granted service connection for the veteran's right shoulder disability, effective June 30, 2001. The veteran is seeking an earlier effective date.
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for allergic rhinitis was denied as there is no basis to assign a higher than 10 percent disability rating. The claim for separate ratings for tinnitus in each ear was also denied due to the revised VA practice that only a single 10 percent evaluation can be assigned.
The Board has ordered additional development due to the need for clarification of the impact of in-service noise exposure on the veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus.
The veteran was granted an effective date of May 30, 2003 for special monthly pension (SMP) at the housebound rate due to her entitlement to a combined disability rating of 60 percent or more.
The veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, jungle rot, and hypothyroidism were denied as there is no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board found no evidence that the veteran submitted a claim prior to June 13, 2001 for service connection of PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, or tinnitus. Therefore, effective dates earlier than those assigned are not warranted.
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to incomplete VA medical records and the need for further review by a Decision Review Officer.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims due to incomplete information and need for additional examinations.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his claims, including obtaining Social Security Administration (SSA) records and VA treatment records.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, finding that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen his left foot disorder claim. The other claims were also denied.
The veteran is attempting to advance a claim for an earlier effective date for awards of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and bilateral tinnitus. However, as noted above, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) has made it clear that there can be no 'freestanding' claim for an earlier effective date, because to allow such a claim would be contrary to the principles of finality set forth in 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105. The appeal is dismissed.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that no formal or informal claims were filed before March 29, 2002.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, finding that the veteran's recollections of his experiences in World War II are consistent with the nature and circumstances of combat action. The veteran is not entitled to service connection for bilateral hearing loss or tinnitus as there was no medical evidence provided by VA.
← Back to Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.