Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
86,613 vetted Board decisions for Tinnitus (ringing in the ears).
The Board found no evidence of a current hearing loss disability or tinnitus, and the only competent medical opinion stated that the veteran's tinnitus is not related to service. Therefore, both claims for service connection were denied.
The veteran's service-connected tinnitus is already assigned the maximum rating of 10 percent, and no higher rating can be granted under current regulations.
The veteran's service-connected bilateral tinnitus is assigned a maximum rating of 10 percent, and the Board finds no legal basis for separate ratings for each ear.
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for bilateral tinnitus is denied as the maximum schedular evaluation of 10 percent has already been assigned.
The Board has determined that the veteran's right ear hearing loss and tinnitus are service-connected. The decision on left ear hearing loss is pending further development.
The Board dismissed the appeal as there was no clear and unmistakable error in granting service connection for tinnitus with a single 10% evaluation, as the applicable regulation at that time did not allow for separate evaluations for each ear.
The Board dismissed the veteran's claim of clear and unmistakable error in the October 1992 rating decision that granted service connection for tinnitus with a 10 percent evaluation, finding no such error.
The Board has denied the appellant's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and gout of the feet. The claim for gout of the feet was denied as there is no evidence linking it to active military service.
The October 22, 2002 decision awarding a 10 percent rating for tinnitus is not considered to be clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
The veteran's appeal was denied as there is no legal basis for the assignment of a schedular evaluation in excess of 10 percent for tinnitus since December 10, 2001. The issue of entitlement to compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss must be remanded.
The veteran's tinnitus claim is denied, but he is granted service connection for a psychiatric disability (anxiety state with depression) due to the presumption of service connection based on his status as a POW.
The Board found no competent medical evidence linking the veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus to his active service, including noise exposure. As a result, the claims for service connection were denied.
The veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his service-connected tinnitus has been denied. The maximum schedular rating available under the applicable VA regulations is 10% and no additional ratings are permitted based on the current state of the law.
The veteran's claims for service connection and increased rating are being remanded due to inadequate notice under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.
The veteran's service-connected bilateral tinnitus is assigned the maximum schedular rating of 10 percent, and there is no legal basis for a higher evaluation.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether tinnitus is related to service or service-connected hearing loss.
The veteran's service-connected bilateral tinnitus is currently rated at the maximum of 10 percent, and there is no legal basis for a higher rating.
The veteran's service-connected bilateral tinnitus is currently rated at 10 percent, which is the maximum rating authorized under Diagnostic Code 6260. The Board found no legal basis for a schedular evaluation in excess of 10 percent.
The veteran's claim for separate schedular 10 percent disability ratings for tinnitus in each ear was denied as there is no legal basis to award such ratings given the maximum schedular rating of 10 percent has already been assigned.
The veteran's appeal for separate evaluations for each ear of his service-connected bilateral tinnitus was denied as there is no legal basis to award such evaluations.
← Back to Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.