Vertigo & vestibular disorders Board decisions

The Board is remanding the case for further development to determine if the veteran's disequilibrium, claimed as vertigo, is related to his service-connected bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and/or tinnitus.

The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. His right ear hearing loss was rated as noncompensable, his Meniere's disease claim was not addressed due to lack of evidence, and he did not have a lung disability or shoulder/knee disabilities related to military service.

The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including PTSD, bilateral wrist and hip disabilities, hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo with dizziness and nausea, and severe headaches. The evidence does not support a current diagnosis or finding of these conditions.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome, an adjustment disorder with depression and dysthymia, headaches, and a disability manifested by vertigo and dizziness. The appeals were reopened on new evidence, but service connection was not established.

The Board found that the veteran's vertigo, dizziness, or Meniere's disease are not related to service and are not due to a service-connected disability.

The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for a certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring specially adapted housing.

The veteran's claim for a higher initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for varicose vein stripping is granted. The other claims are either denied or pending.

The Board has granted service connection for hypertension. The issues of service connection for gastrointestinal disability, vertigo, and a psychiatric disability (depression) are being remanded due to the lack of VA examination reports.

The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development and clarification of his hearing requests.

The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a depressive disorder or vertigo that is related to his service-connected right ear hearing loss. The claims for these conditions are denied.

The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for Meniere's syndrome and chronic otitis media, right ear. The evidence submitted since the April 2001 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate these claims and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating them.

The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for additional development due to incomplete medical records and a need for an appropriate VA examination.

The Board found no competent medical evidence linking the veteran's vertigo to his service or service-connected hearing loss and tinnitus, and denied the claim for service connection.

The Board found no evidence of vertigo and/or dizziness with nausea during service or present, and denied the claim for service connection.

The veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied, while the claim to reopen a previously denied claim of service connection for bronchitis due to mustard gas exposure was not reopened.

The Board found that the veteran's current vertigo and dizziness are best characterized as non-vestibular in nature rather than Meniere's disease. The preponderance of evidence does not support a link between his service-connected tinnitus and his current condition, nor does it establish a direct connection to service.

The Board finds that the appellant does not meet the criteria for specially adapted housing or a special home adaptation grant due to his service-connected disabilities, as they do not meet the specific eligibility requirements.

The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, finding no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and his military service.

The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence and a need for further examination.

The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development and consideration at the RO level.