Wrist & hand decisions — 2003
334 indexed Board decisions in 2003.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2003
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development and procedural issues, requiring further examination and evidence collection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. His bilateral hearing loss was rated at 10 percent, and his left wrist fracture from December 8, 2000 to January 31, 2001 warranted a 20 percent rating. However, the claim for a higher rating after May 1, 2001 was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his right wrist disorder, finding that it does not meet the criteria for a rating greater than 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board found that the veteran's disabilities do not render him permanently and totally disabled for pension purposes, as they are rated at less than 100% combined.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board denied an increased rating for service-connected residuals of fractures of both wrists, prior to March 2002, as the evidence did not show dorsiflexion limited to less than 15 degrees or palmar flexion limited in line with the forearm.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2003
The Board has granted initial non-compensable evaluations for the veteran's service-connected post-operative carpal tunnel release of both wrists, effective January 8, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have service connection for hearing loss, right ankle injury, right wrist sprain, tinnitus, left knee chondromalacia, serous otitis media, or cyst of the right testicle. The evaluation for lumbosacral strain is 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board denied service connection for a left wrist disorder in June 1997, finding that the evidence did not show a present disorder was related to service. The veteran's claim has been reopened with new evidence submitted since then, but this evidence does not meet the criteria of being 'new and material' as it is cumulative or redundant.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The veteran's appeal was denied for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals, left wrist fracture. Service connection for PTSD and a gunshot wound to the chest were also denied. The claim to reopen service connection for head injury, right ankle disorder, and back disorder was not granted due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The VA denied the veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected left wrist disability, currently rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's right wrist injury and back injury are not related to service, with the exception of a secondary relationship for the right wrist injury. The claims have been denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board found no current right wrist, Achilles tendonitis, or PTSD disabilities and denied the veteran's claims for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2003
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected right wrist condition does not warrant a compensable rating. For his claim of service connection for degenerative joint disease of the lumbosacral spine, the evidence did not establish chronicity during service and continuity after discharge, leading to denial.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2003
The veteran's service-connected ulnar nerve entrapment of the right elbow is rated as noncompensably disabling prior to August 30, 2001, and 10 percent disabling from that date. The veteran's service-connected status post carpal tunnel release is currently rated as 10 percent disabling.
← Back to Wrist & hand overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.