Wrist & hand decisions — 2007
533 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2007
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims due to insufficient medical evidence and a need for further examinations. The veteran is required to undergo VA examinations to determine if his current eye, left wrist, and skin rash conditions are related to service-connected diabetes or any other factors.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for left wrist injury, right knee injury, and bilateral hand or palm disability due to lack of evidence of current disabilities in service records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2007
The veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded to the RO for further development, including additional medical inquiry. The case will be returned to the Board for further consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2007
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU were denied. The RO found that the veteran did not meet the criteria for higher evaluations based on his service-connected right ankle, left ankle, low back strain, left shoulder, right shoulder, and left wrist disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2007
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of medical evidence regarding the etiology of the veteran's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. The claim is now pending for further examination and review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2007
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and arranging for VA examinations to assess the severity of the veteran's service-connected right arm disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2007
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected left wrist disability is being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2007
The veteran's claims were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for an initial compensable or higher rating for his service-connected bilateral plantar fasciitis, lumbosacral spine spondylosis, degenerative disc disease, right wrist tendonitis, and left wrist tendonitis.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for carpal tunnel syndrome and an increased evaluation for cervical spine degenerative joint disease, finding that there was no evidence linking the current disability to service or a service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development of his service connection claims and earlier effective date claims. The RO must attempt to obtain in-patient clinical hospital records from Fort McClellan, Fort Polk, and Alexandria VA Medical Center.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a muscle injury from the shoulders to the mid-back and an increased rating for his service-connected right hand/wrist injuries with borderline carpal tunnel syndrome, finding that there was no current disability or evidence of such in the record.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further examination and to obtain additional medical records. The issues are related to the initial ratings assigned for his service-connected left wrist fracture, right knee injury, and lumbar strain.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and VA treatment records. A VA examination will be conducted to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The veteran's appeal for service connection of the right wrist and heels as secondary to his knees, a higher initial evaluation for PTSD, and increased ratings for knee disabilities were denied. The effective dates for instability evaluations were also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for higher initial disability ratings for hemorrhoids and tendonitis of the right wrist, as there is no evidence that meets the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The right ankle condition is currently rated as 10 percent disabling, the left wrist condition as 10 percent disabling, and the bursitis of the elbow as 10 percent disabling. Tinea pedis does not warrant a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has denied the veteran's claim for compensation benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a left wrist injury, finding that there is no evidence showing that his participation in vocational rehabilitation caused a disability warranting such benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The veteran's right wrist disability is rated at 40 percent disabling, but his claims for increased evaluations and service connection are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for right ear hearing loss, diabetes mellitus, and left wrist disability. The evidence did not show current disabilities that met VA criteria or a relationship to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2007
The veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection were denied.,Service connection was not granted for headaches, TMJ, or cervical spine whiplash.
← Back to Wrist & hand overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.