The Board found that the veteran's residuals of a fracture of the right mandible met the criteria for a 10% evaluation effective February 17, 1994. The left renal calculus was not productive of any ascertainable residuals and thus warranted a noncompensable rating.
The deciding factor: The objective evidence showed limitation of motion to 40 mm in the mandible, meeting the criteria for a 10% evaluation under current Diagnostic Codes. There was no residual kidney stone or colic attacks as required for a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- Fracture of the Right Mandible, Left Renal Calculus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- January 3, 2000
- Citation
- 0000039
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0000039.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a fracture to the right mandible do not warrant an increased rating beyond the current 10 percent assigned.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a fracture of the right mandible do not meet the criteria for an increased disability rating beyond the current 10 percent assigned.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.