The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's current disabilities to service, specifically denying claims for residuals of facial burns and skin cancer. The Board concluded that there was insufficient medical evidence connecting these conditions to service or exposure to ionizing radiation.
The deciding factor: There is no competent medical evidence establishing a nexus between the veteran's current disabilities and his military service or exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of facial burns, skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 5, 2000
- Citation
- 0000150
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0000150.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for skin cancer to obtain an addendum medical opinion addressing the Veteran's exposure to jet fuel and firefighting foam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for prostate cancer and skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma) to provide the Veteran with VA examinations and opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions, including considering toxic exposure risk activities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examination and opinion regarding service connection for skin cancer. The Veteran seeks service connection based on exposure during active duty at Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's service connection for skin cancer, specifically related to his exposure to herbicide agents and participation in toxic exposure risk activities. The case will be further developed with a new medical opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.