The Board denied the veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than March 12, 1997 for a 30 percent disability rating for service-connected ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to lack of evidence showing symptomatology consistent with such rating within one year prior to the application.
The deciding factor: The Board found that it was not factually ascertainable that the veteran experienced symptomatology consistent with a 30 percent disability rating for ureteropelvic junction obstruction within one year before March 12, 1997.
- Claimed conditions
- ureteropelvic junction obstruction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- February 7, 2000
- Citation
- 0003006
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0003006.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing congenital left hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction was aggravated by his military service, and granted service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal is denied as the service connection for a scar status post kidney operation is not granted due to the usual effects of surgical treatment in service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.