The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his back disability is denied as the evidence does not show that he meets the criteria for a higher rating under VA's schedular guidelines.,The effective date of the 60% rating for the service-connected back disability is set at November 22, 1994. The claim for an earlier effective date is denied because it was not factually ascertainable that the veteran met the criteria for a 60% rating prior to this date.,The effective date of the total disability rating based on individual unemployability is set at November 17, 1998. The claim for an earlier effective date is denied because it was not factually ascertainable that the veteran met the criteria for a total disability rating based on his service-connected disabilities prior to this date.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show that the veteran's back disability meets or exceeds the criteria for a higher rating under VA's schedular guidelines.,It was not factually ascertainable prior to November 22, 1994, that the veteran met the criteria for a 60% rating due to pronounced intervertebral disc syndrome. The evidence from this date onward is considered in determining the effective date of the increased rating.,It was not factually ascertainable prior to November 17, 1998, that the veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation. The evidence from this date onward is considered in determining the effective date for the total disability rating.
- Claimed conditions
- Back Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- February 22, 2000
- Citation
- 0004583
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0004583.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for GERD and remanded the claims for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome, a back disability, and sinusitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development and to ensure compliance with VA's duty to assist.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for hypertension is dismissed as the claim has been fully granted. The claims for bilateral hearing loss, back disability, fatigue, and acquired psychiatric disability are remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including a back disability, right and left lower extremity peripheral nerve disabilities, a right foot disability, sleep apnea, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus, to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.