Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The veteran withdrew his appeal on the issues of whether new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen his claim for a gastrointestinal disorder, and entitlement to an increased evaluation for urticaria with angioedema.

The deciding factor: The veteran formally withdrew his appeals by stating he will not contest the Department of Veterans Affairs finding in both cases.

Claimed conditions
gastrointestinal disorder, urticaria
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 29, 2000
Citation
0005371

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0005371.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.