The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were granted, with the left facial wound with retained shrapnel being directly connected to his active duty. The chest disability received a 20 percent rating effective October 7, 1996, and the knee condition received a 10 percent rating effective March 25, 1991.
The deciding factor: The veteran's service records confirmed combat involvement, which supported his claim for service connection. The chest disability was rated based on its current manifestations post-October 7, 1996, and the knee condition received a compensable rating effective March 25, 1991.
- Claimed conditions
- left facial wound with retained shrapnel, gunshot wound to the left chest with hemothorax and left diaphragm elevation, left chondromalacia patella
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- March 31, 2000
- Citation
- 0008598
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0008598.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal, and the Board dismissed it.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for right and left chondromalacia patella, finding that the evidence does not support a link between these conditions and the Veteran's active service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a temporary total evaluation due to hospitalization because the hospitalization did not exceed 21 days, even when combining both hospitalizations at Harris Regional Hospital and Mission Hospital.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions and failure to address specific evidence. The Veteran's left knee disorder, including left chondromalacia patella, is being reviewed again for service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.