The Board has granted service connection for the residuals of a laceration to the left ring finger, but denied secondary service connection for contracture of the left palm and not well grounded service connection for an ulcer disease.
The deciding factor: The veteran's claim for service connection for ulcers was found to be not well grounded as he did not submit appropriate medical evidence establishing a current, active ulcer disease or linking his claimed history of ulcer disease to his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- laceration of the left ring finger, ulcer disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 5, 2000
- Citation
- 0009067
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0009067.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for cervical pain, lower back disability, bilateral foot disability, bronchitis, hypertension, stomach injury, ulcer disease, prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, and bilateral hearing loss. The Board found that there was no evidence of a chronic condition during or within one year after service, and that any current conditions are not related to service.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected ulcer disease and adjustment disorder did not prevent her from securing or following substantially gainful employment prior to October 22, 2016. The Board denied the claim for TDIU.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected laceration of the left ring finger was granted, but he is still denied an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for his scar. The Board found that there were no ankylosis or doctor-prescribed bed rest issues and concluded that the preponderance of evidence supported a 10 percent rating.
- Denied
The Veteran's keratectomy scar is not rated compensably, and his ulcer disease is rated at 20 percent before June 30, 2016. The Board denied a rating in excess of 20 percent for ulcer disease throughout the claim period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.