The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected fracture of the right fifth finger was denied by the Board. The VA examination revealed some aching pain and occasional stiffness in the finger, but no significant functional loss or deformity.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show any significant functional loss or deformity that would warrant a compensable evaluation for the veteran's service-connected fracture of the right fifth finger.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the right fifth finger
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 12, 2000
- Citation
- 0009729
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0009729.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD has been found to preclude all substantially gainful employment, leading to a TDIU effective March 29, 2022. Effective March 21, 2025, the Veteran is also in receipt of SMC due to his combined rating exceeding 70%.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claim for service connection for chronic sinusitis was denied. The veteran was granted an initial 10 percent disability rating for hypertension. Other claims were either denied or remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims for TDIU, higher disability evaluations for left total knee arthroplasty, and SMC. The Veteran will need a VA examination to assess her functional impairment due to her service-connected disabilities and their impact on her employability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that new evidence has been submitted and requires the AOJ to review this evidence and issue a supplemental statement of the case.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.