Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

New evidence has been submitted since the RO's March 1994 decision, which is significant enough to consider in order to fairly decide the merits of the claim. The veteran now has a current skin disability and had ongoing skin manifestations since service.

The deciding factor: The new evidence shows treatment for various skin conditions that are relevant to the claim.

Claimed conditions
skin rash disorder, psoriasis, tinea cruris, herpes zoster, tinea manus, tinea corporis
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 18, 2000
Citation
0010251

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0010251.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.