The Board found that the veteran's Reiter's syndrome was not present in service or for many years after service, and is not causally related to an incident of service or a service-connected disability. The condition was also not aggravated by a service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not establish a link between the veteran's Reiter's syndrome and his military service or any service-connected disability.
- Claimed conditions
- Reiter's syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 21, 2000
- Citation
- 0010587
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0010587.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an increased rating for Reiter's syndrome and granted service connection for ulcerative colitis as secondary to Reiter's syndrome, effective December 11, 2001.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's sleep apnea, specifically whether it is at least as likely as not caused or aggravated by his service-connected Reiter's syndrome and foot disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the appeal due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, specifically failing to obtain in-service hospitalization records and post-service private treatment records. The Veteran's appeal for service connection for Reiter's syndrome and residuals of meningitis is now pending again.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and earlier effective dates were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for his lower back disability, right and left lower extremity radiculopathy, or residuals of a right knee injury with chondromalacia and degenerative changes.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.