Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for secondary service connection to Agent Orange exposure, but finds that none of the individual conditions have been well grounded.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not provide a plausible basis for each condition being related to AO exposure.

Claimed conditions
skin disorder, sleep disorder, prostate disorder, memory loss, urinary tract infection, kidney disorder
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
Agent Orange / herbicides
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 27, 2000
Citation
0011217

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0011217.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.