The Board has granted a 50 percent evaluation for dyshidrotic eczema of both feet, and denied service connection for post-concussion syndrome due to lack of well-grounded evidence.
The deciding factor: The claim for post-concussion syndrome is not supported by cognizable evidence demonstrating that the claim is plausible or capable of substantiation.
- Claimed conditions
- dyshidrotic eczema of both feet, post-concussion syndrome
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- May 16, 2000
- Citation
- 0012929
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0012929.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for post-concussion syndrome, migraine headaches, and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) as these conditions clearly and unmistakably preexisted the Veteran's active duty service and were not permanently worsened beyond their natural progression by such service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for headaches and post-concussion syndrome to schedule a VA examination due to missing service treatment records.
- Granted
The veteran's claim for service connection of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as secondary to major depressive disorder with anxious distress and post-concussion syndrome has been granted. The evidence was balanced, but the benefit of the doubt was given to the veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the claim for service connection of post-concussion syndrome because the Veteran was not given a VA examination to determine if her symptoms were related to this condition. The case will be reviewed again with new evidence.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.