Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board dismissed the appeals because the veteran did not file a timely notice of disagreement with the March 1996 and April 1999 rating decisions.

The deciding factor: The veteran failed to submit a timely notice of disagreement within one year from the date of the decision, as required by law.

Claimed conditions
hemorrhoids, fracture of the right fifth metacarpal, left knee condition
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 25, 2000
Citation
0013818

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0013818.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.