The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and an increased evaluation for hyperhidrosis of his hands and feet, finding that there was no credible evidence supporting the occurrence of the claimed stressors or disability. The skin condition is rated at 10%.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the veteran did not engage in combat with the enemy during service and thus could not establish PTSD based on unverified stressor reports. For hyperhidrosis, there was no evidence of extensive lesions or marked disfigurement as required for a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- post traumatic stress disorder, hyperhidrosis of the hands and feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- June 8, 2000
- Citation
- 0015180
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0015180.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for beneficiary travel benefits associated with a June 13, 2024, VA medical appointment is granted due to the timely submission of a paper claim within 30 days after completing the travel.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have prevented him from securing and following substantially gainful employment since July 6, 2006. The Board has granted a TDIU effective that date, along with an effective date for Dependents' Educational Assistance benefits of the same date.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the cases for further development and verification of service dates, stressor events, and records. Service connection will be reconsidered based on the new information.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to insufficient evidence to decide the claim, including a need for VA examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.