Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board is remanding the case to the RO for further development, including obtaining additional evidence from doctors who may have opinions regarding the nature and extent of the appellant's back disorder. The claim will be re-adjudicated in accordance with the directives set forth by the Court.

The deciding factor: The new and material evidence has been identified but the sufficiency of the evidence to reopen the previously denied claims is yet to be determined.

Claimed conditions
back disorder
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 14, 2000
Citation
0015704

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0015704.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.