The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is granted, as the amputation of his left great toe was determined to be a result of VA treatment without fault on their part.
The deciding factor: The decision found that the amputation resulted from VA medical or surgical treatment and did not find any fault on the part of the VA.
- Claimed conditions
- amputation of the left great toe
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2000
- Citation
- 0018623
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0018623.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied a rating in excess of 10 percent for amputation of the left great toe and granted a separate 10 percent rating for calluses of the left foot. The amputation was not rated higher due to the absence of removal of the metatarsal head, while the calluses were found to be moderate in severity.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for amputation of the left great toe and a left foot hammertoe deformity (toes two through five) as secondary to amputation of the left great toe due to new evidence. The issues have been raised but not fully addressed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded three issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, including diabetes mellitus and its secondary effects on peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities and amputation of the left great toe. The decision notes that more recent VA treatment records are needed to determine if the Veteran now meets the criteria for a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. � 1151 for amputations of his legs and a stroke, alleging that improper delay in treatment by VA led to these conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.