The veteran's case is being remanded to the RO for scheduling a video-conference hearing at the Seattle RO due to his failure to appear for an earlier scheduled Travel Board hearing.
The deciding factor: The veteran failed to attend the previously scheduled Travel Board hearing and requested rescheduling for a video conference hearing.
- Claimed conditions
- lumbar disk disease, residuals of a lumbar strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2000
- Citation
- 0018645
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0018645.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for lumbar disk disease, with right S1 radiculopathy, status post lumbar discectomy and laminectomy is granted. The Board found that the evidence was in approximate balance, granting the benefit of doubt to the Veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a new medical opinion is needed to determine if the Veteran's low back disability, including lumbar disk disease and a low back strain, is causally or etiologically related to service. The case will be remanded for this purpose.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including lumbar disk disease, traumatic arthritis of the left ankle, and complete bony ankylosis of the great left toe, are found to be so severe that they prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation. The Board grants his claim for TDIU.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.