Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied compensation for urinary incontinence, but granted compensation for impotence resulting from the appellant's May 1990 prostate surgery.

The deciding factor: The Board found a causal relationship between the May 1990 radical retropubic prostatectomy and subsequent development of erectile dysfunction (impotence), which was not a necessary consequence of the treatment.

Claimed conditions
Urinary Incontinence, Impotence
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 19, 2000
Citation
0018865

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0018865.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.