Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board found that the June 1956 rating decision was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous in failing to award service connection for TMJ and denying service connection for a disability of the eyes, as the evidence before the RO did not support these claims at that time.

The deciding factor: The medical evidence before the RO in June 1956 did not establish chronic disabilities involving TMJ or eye pathology present in service or continuity of related symptoms after service.

Claimed conditions
temporomandibular joint dysfunction, eye pathology
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 9, 2000
Citation
0020846

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0020846.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.