Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board found that the veteran's bilateral eye disorders, including loss of vision, represent the continuance or natural progress of his pre-existing conditions for which VA treatment was furnished during the 1990s. As such, compensation benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 were not warranted.

The deciding factor: The veteran's bilateral eye disorders and loss of vision are due to the natural progression of his pre-existing conditions rather than VA treatment.

Claimed conditions
bilateral eye disorders, loss of vision
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 9, 2000
Citation
0020872

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0020872.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.