Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has granted a 30% rating for rheumatic heart disease effective January 12, 1998. Prior to that date, the condition was rated as 10%. The evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating.

The deciding factor: The June 1995 stress test showed the veteran achieved 6 METs, which supports a 30% rating under the new regulations effective January 12, 1998. There was no evidence of left ventricular dysfunction or a workload greater than 5 METs.

Claimed conditions
rheumatic heart disease
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
30%
Decision date
August 15, 2000
Citation
0021496

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0021496.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.