The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional medical examination and development of his claims file. The issue remains whether he should receive a higher rating for his right fifth finger fracture.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence was requested to determine the extent of the veteran's current disability, including during flare-ups and repetitive use.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a fracture of the right fifth finger
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 12, 2000
- Citation
- 0024162
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0024162.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and effective dates are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and consideration of new evidence.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction, special monthly compensation based on the need for aid & attendance/housebound status, and temporary total rating based on surgical or other treatment necessitating convalescence associated with a heart attack in March 2010 were denied. The Board also found that extraschedular ratings for his right knee disabilities and residuals of a fracture of the right fifth finger were not warranted.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for major depressive disorder, reopening of previously denied claims for left knee disability and low back disability (degenerative changes with low back pain) were remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board is remanding the case to ensure a complete record and readjudicate the claims of whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, and residuals of a fracture of the right fifth finger.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining records from the Marine Reserve and a VA audiology examination to determine if the Veteran's hearing loss is related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.