The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Muskogee Regional Medical Center from October 19, 1998 through October 27, 1998 is granted. The case was remanded to allow for additional development and consideration.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the veteran's claim met all criteria under 38 C.F.R. § 17.120 regarding unauthorized medical expenses incurred due to a service-connected disability (nephritis).
- Claimed conditions
- Nephritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 15, 2000
- Citation
- 0024569
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0024569.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence under the new rating criteria for renal dysfunction, and a new VA examination is needed.
- Granted
The claim for service connection for systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus) is reopened and granted. The appeal is also granted for the issues of service connection for nephritis and TDIU, as they are inextricably intertwined with the reopening of the lupus claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and requesting a medical opinion regarding the nature and likely etiology of the Veteran's kidney disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board is remanding the case to determine if a timely Notice of Disagreement (NOD) was filed regarding the denial of the appellant's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical care expenses incurred from January 19 to January 24, 2011. Additionally, the AOJ should contact CMS to determine whether any of the expenses were covered by Medicare Part A or B.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.