The Board denied an increased disability evaluation for left eye enucleation, finding that the appellant's condition does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on inability to wear a prosthesis or having light perception only in the nonservice-connected right eye.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show that the appellant is unable to wear a prosthesis or has light perception only in his nonservice-connected right eye, which are required for an increased disability evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye enucleation
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- September 21, 2000
- Citation
- 0025287
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0025287.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected eye disability was granted a 70 percent rating from March 23, 2015 to October 14, 2015. The appeal is denied for higher ratings beyond this period.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to missing VA treatment records and inadequate medical opinions regarding the cause of the left eye enucleation. The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 USC § 1151 is being reviewed again.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining an addendum medical opinion regarding the frequency of his macula swelling and its impact on visual field loss. A separate rating for headaches as secondary to service-connected left eye enucleation with right eye central serous retinopathy must also be scheduled.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining an addendum opinion from the April 2019 examiner to determine the severity of the Veteran's right eye disability and whether his metamorphopsia is a symptom separate from decreased contrast sensitivity.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.