The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for bilateral pterygium due to new evidence submitted since the last denial. The underlying merits will be considered based on whether the pre-existing condition was aggravated during service.
The deciding factor: New medical evidence indicates that the appellant's bilateral pterygium condition worsened after service, which could support a finding of aggravation.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Pterygium
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 16, 2000
- Citation
- 0027401
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0027401.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating of his service-connected bilateral pterygium is being remanded due to a duty to assist error. A new VA examination is required to assess the current severity of the condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several claims related to PTSD, shoulder conditions, COPD, and pterygium. The Veteran's service-connected conditions will need further evaluation by VA examiners.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted a rating of 20 percent for bilateral pterygium, effective from the date of the decision.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial rating greater than 10 percent prior to April 1, 2020, and greater than 20 percent prior to December 14, 2022, for bilateral pterygium, finding that his service-connected bilateral pterygium is manifested by at worst a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 throughout the appeal period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.