The veteran's claim for service connection for limitation of motion of the cervical spine is not well grounded. His claim for a rating in excess of 20 percent for sacroiliac strain is denied as there are no manifestations that warrant such a higher rating. The veteran's need for SMC based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person is also denied.
The deciding factor: The veteran has not presented evidence to support his claim for service connection for limitation of motion of the cervical spine, which he asserts is traceable to injury incurred in service. His sacroiliac strain disability does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as there are no manifestations that warrant such a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- sacroiliac strain, anxiety neurosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 19, 2000
- Citation
- 0027696
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0027696.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of CUE in the June 1972 and March 1991 rating decisions for initial adjudication by the AOJ.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal of the July 1980 rating decision, finding that it did not commit an error in failing to adjudicate a claim for service connection for 'delayed stress reaction.' The July 1980 rating decision was found to be final and correct as applied at the time.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's TDIU claim is denied as his service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded two issues: increased ratings for lumbosacral strain and sacroiliac strain, as well as an increased rating for plantar fasciitis of the right foot. The decision does not address service connection theory or exposure basis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.