The Board found that there is no medical evidence of a disability of the legs which is a residual of a shell fragment wound. Therefore, the claim for service connection for residuals of shell fragment wounds to the legs was denied.
The deciding factor: There is no current disability related to shell fragment wounds to the legs as evidenced by the absence of any medical diagnosis and the lack of continuity of symptomatology since service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of shell fragment wounds to the legs, residuals of shell fragment wounds to the back
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2000
- Citation
- 0028053
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0028053.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of shell fragment wounds to the back are rated as noncompensable under Diagnostic Code 7804. The Board finds that his scars do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on their size, stability, or symptoms.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for residuals of shell fragment wounds to the right ear, chest, right shoulder, and back have been dismissed due to his death.
- Denied
The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected tender scars, residuals of shell fragment wounds to his legs do not warrant a higher disability rating than 10 percent.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of shell fragment wounds to his legs and knees, as well as a compensable rating for residuals of shell fragment wounds to his left foot (2nd and 3rd toes). The decision found that while the veteran sustained injuries in combat during World War II, there was no evidence of SFWs to his legs or knees. However, he has current disability involving his legs and knees as a residual of shrapnel wounds from service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.