The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation and service connection was denied. The VA examiners did not find a relationship between the service-connected residuals of a fracture of the left ulna styloid process of the left wrist and epicondylitis of the left elbow and his claimed nervous disorder.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners found no evidence of a relationship between the veteran's service-connected disabilities and his claimed nervous disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the left ulna styloid process, epicondylitis of the left elbow
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2000
- Citation
- 0028329
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0028329.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's prescribed topical skin medication, triamcinolone cream, caused irreparable damage to his clothing and the Board granted a clothing allowance for 2020 based on this.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for left elbow epicondylitis is being remanded due to the need for additional information and a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to insufficient detail in the VA examinations and a recent private medical opinion suggesting service connection for pes planus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded three cases involving the Veteran's elbow and bilateral knees due to incomplete range of motion testing in previous examinations. The claims are being returned for further examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.