The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his gunshot wound to the chest was granted, with a current rating of 20 percent. The appeal also included a secondary service connection claim for anxiety and depression due to pain from the injury.
The deciding factor: The veteran's gunshot wound residuals were found to be adequately rated at 20 percent under the old criteria, which is the maximum available rating for muscle injuries.
- Claimed conditions
- gunshot wound to the chest
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2000
- Citation
- 0028348
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0028348.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for cause of death due to lack of evidence of a current disability or in-service incurrence.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected schizophrenia reaction, gunshot wound to the chest, and left ulna fracture render him in need of regular aid and attendance due to his condition. The Board granted Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him incapable of securing or following a substantially gainful occupation at all times during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Veteran's claim for a rating increase for his gunshot wound was granted, but his pension benefits were denied due to his felony conviction. The Board found that the denial of pension benefits was not clear and unmistakable error.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.