The Board has determined that the service-connected conditions did not contribute to the veteran's death or significantly aggravate his non-service connected conditions, leading to a denial of the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The deciding factor: The VA staff physician concluded that the service-connected conditions did not contribute to the veteran's death and that there was no evidence suggesting they aggravated any non-service connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- multiorgan failure, hepatic failure due to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding, chronic renal failure
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 1, 2000
- Citation
- 0028907
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0028907.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's cause of death, metastatic lung cancer, was found to be related to service and caused or contributed substantially to the Veteran's death. The Board granted entitlement to service connection for the Veteran's cause of death.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for prostate cancer and chronic renal failure, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to the Veteran's military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cause of death, including pneumonia and COPD, is being remanded to determine if it was due to exposure to jet fuel during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the February 2022 decision denying eligibility to enroll in the PCAFC is not consistent with applicable law and requires remand for development based on a precedent case. The Veteran's eligibility should be evaluated under the correct statutory criteria.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.