The veteran's unauthorized medical expenses related to treatment on June 24 and 25, 1997 at Monongalia General Hospital are granted as the condition was a non-service-connected gynecological condition requiring immediate attention due to a medical emergency.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the gynecological condition involved a medical emergency and that no VA or Federal facilities were feasibly available for treatment, necessitating private care.
- Claimed conditions
- gynecological condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 17, 2000
- Citation
- 0030084
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0030084.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a gynecological condition, including infertility, and special monthly compensation (SMC) based on loss of use of a creative organ.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication of the claims for service connection for bilateral pes planus, a bilateral knee condition, and a back condition (including back pain) based on new and relevant evidence. The claim for a gynecological condition was denied.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for right ear hearing loss was dismissed due to a failure to file a notice of disagreement within one year of the denial letter. The claim for gynecological condition is remanded due to an incomplete VA medical examination and unobtained private records.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant, and therefore, it is dismissed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.