The Board found that the veteran does not currently have chronic priapism or impotence and denied his claim for compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 based on VA treatment.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show current chronic priapism or impotence, and the Board determined that these conditions were likely due to non-service connected factors (diabetes mellitus and Thorazine).
- Claimed conditions
- Priapism, Impotence
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 24, 2000
- Citation
- 0030641
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0030641.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the erectile and prostate disorder, particularly in relation to service-connected conditions like heart disability and diabetes.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for restoration of the 100% rating for prostate cancer was denied. A 40% rating for residuals of prostate cancer from May 1, 2018 is granted. The Veteran is also granted TDIU effective May 1, 2018.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied a compensable rating for impotence associated with residuals of a radical prostatectomy, finding that the Veteran did not have deformity of the penis and was already receiving compensation for erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection for degenerative arthritis of the thoracolumbar spine is granted. The Board finds that remanding the issues of service connection for sleep apnea, hypertension, and impotence is necessary as the representative has recently advanced that these disorders may be secondary to obesity caused by the service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.