The Board has remanded the claim due to insufficient evidence and requested additional medical records, a VA examination, and further development of the record.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for more information and clarification regarding the relationship between any current respiratory/pulmonary disorder and the veteran's active military service.
- Claimed conditions
- respiratory/pulmonary disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 24, 2000
- Citation
- 0030698
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0030698.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claim for a respiratory/pulmonary disorder, including sarcoidosis, is remanded due to the need for further development regarding toxic exposure risk activities. The TDIU claim is also remanded as it may be affected by the outcome of the service connection claim.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew all his pending appeals before the Board, including those for increased ratings and service connection claims. The appeal is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory/pulmonary disorder, including restrictive lung disease, emphysema, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asbestosis and lung cancer. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to service exposure to asbestos.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical examination and a need for further evaluation of the Veteran's respiratory/pulmonary disorder, including its relationship to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.