The Board has determined that the veteran's skin disability does not warrant an increased rating, and his bilateral foot disability is currently rated at its maximum allowable under VA regulations.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence shows that the veteran's skin disability does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on systemic or nervous manifestations, ulcerations, or exceptionally repugnant conditions. The bilateral foot disability is rated as 50% disabling under Diagnostic Code 5278, which requires marked contraction of plantar fasciae with dropped forefoot, all toes hammer toes, very painful callosities and marked varus deformity.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Foot Disability, Skin Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 30, 2000
- Citation
- 0031296
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0031296.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various disabilities and denied higher ratings for several service-connected conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for sinusitis, TBI, obstructive sleep apnea, and bilateral foot disability as the evidence did not support a finding of current disabilities related to in-service events or exposures.
- Partly granted
The Board denied a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD and remanded claims for service connection for left shoulder, right shoulder, bilateral foot, left ankle, right ankle, and cervical spine disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for erectile dysfunction and service connection for a bilateral foot disability, finding no evidence of increased severity or etiological relationship to military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.