The veteran's claims for increased disability evaluations for bladder dysfunction and bowel dysfunction, as well as his claim for special monthly compensation on account of loss of use of the upper extremities, were denied by the RO. The veteran is still seeking benefits for these conditions.
The deciding factor: The RO determined that there was no new evidence to support a higher disability evaluation or additional compensation claims.
- Claimed conditions
- bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 6, 2000
- Citation
- 0031874
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0031874.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 60 percent disability rating for aphonia, restored the 60 percent rating for bladder dysfunction, and denied SMC based on loss of use of the right upper extremity.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for eligibility for specially adapted housing is granted due to his service-connected disabilities affecting the function of balance and propulsion, precluding locomotion.
- Partly granted
The Board granted an effective date of August 10, 2022, for the grant of service connection for erectile dysfunction and bowel dysfunction, and a disability rating of 30 percent for bowel dysfunction on and after that date.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for a genitourinary condition, including bladder dysfunction, renal dysfunction, and kidney disease, due to inadequate VA examinations that failed to address key evidence from service treatment records.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.