The Board has determined that additional development is needed in order to properly adjudicate the appellant's claims, including obtaining an opinion regarding whether any of the veteran's service-connected disabilities caused or contributed substantially or materially to his death.
The deciding factor: Further development is required due to changes in the law and pending issues not yet addressed by the RO.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a fracture of the tibia and fibula with atrophy of the left calf and shortening of the leg, absence or partial right fibula, incomplete paralysis of the ulnar nerve in the left forearm due to gunshot wound, degenerative changes of the lumbosacral spine, symptomatic residual scars at the graft site, chronic osteomyelitis of the left tibia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 13, 2000
- Citation
- 0032499
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0032499.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for multiple conditions, including adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood, GERD, contact dermatitis, left ankle gout, degenerative changes of the lumbosacral spine, left knee meniscal tear and gout, left big toe gout, left elbow gout, status post cervical fusion, and sleep apnea, as they are related to active duty training (ACDUTRA).
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and the Board has granted entitlement to a TDIU.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to incomplete development and requests for clarification on service connection for right and left hip disabilities, as well as a disability rating for lumbosacral spine issues. The effective date of TDIU and DEA awards is also in question.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a lumbar spine disorder, finding that the Veteran's preexisting scoliosis did not worsen during service and that his current degenerative changes of the lumbosacral spine were not shown to be related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.