The Board found that the reduction of the veteran's defective hearing rating from 50% to 10% was proper based on the improvement in his hearing acuity as evidenced by recent audiometric tests.
The deciding factor: The RO complied with procedural requirements and provided adequate evidence showing sustained improvement in the veteran's hearing acuity.
- Claimed conditions
- Defective Hearing
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 15, 2000
- Citation
- 0032803
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0032803.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for increased SMC under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(p) and higher rate of SMC based on the need for a higher level of aid and attendance under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(r)(2) is denied due to lack of eligibility for compensation at the maximum rate or intermediate rate authorized.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's defective hearing has been rated as noncompensable, and the Board found that his hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on audiometric testing results.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board in 1956 incorrectly applied the presumption of soundness, leading to a denial of service connection for defective hearing. The Court reversed this decision and held that if the Board had correctly applied the law at the time, it would have found service connection due to the Veteran's preexisting condition worsening during service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran does not have service-connected defective hearing as his current hearing loss is not shown to be related to military service, including noise exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.