The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased evaluation and earlier effective date for his service-connected right clavicle fracture residuals, finding that the evidence did not show a factual basis prior to June 8, 1998.
The deciding factor: The RO found that the objective evidence of record did not warrant a higher disability evaluation prior to June 8, 1998.
- Claimed conditions
- Right clavicle fracture residuals
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- December 18, 2000
- Citation
- 0032857
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0032857.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for right clavicle fracture residuals prior to July 27, 2017 was granted. A 30 percent rating is now in effect for this period. The claim for a higher rating from July 27, 2017 remains denied. Additionally, the Veteran's TDIU claim was granted effective March 28, 2008.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and right clavicle fracture residuals, finding that the evidence did not support a nexus between these conditions and active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining relevant medical records and conducting examinations to determine the nature and etiology of any psychiatric and orthopedic disabilities. The Veteran's claims will be re-adjudicated after these actions.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for higher ratings for his right clavicle fracture and right index finger fractures, finding that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 10 percent for the right clavicle fracture or any compensable rating for the right index finger fractures.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.