The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected antral gastritis was granted, with the current rating of 10 percent being maintained.
The deciding factor: The RO found that the evidence did not warrant a higher rating based on the nature and severity of the veteran's antral gastritis.
- Claimed conditions
- antral gastritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2000
- Citation
- 0033666
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0033666.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's hypertension is granted as due to herbicide agent exposure under the PACT Act. The claim for an initial compensable rating for gastritis is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's stomach disorder and its relation to service, as well as his heart disability. The case will be returned for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's stomach disorders, including GERD, hiatal hernia, and Barrett's esophagus. The case will be reviewed again with new evidence and a more thorough examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case to determine if the combined effects of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities warrant an extra-schedular disability rating, as the current schedular ratings do not adequately contemplate the collective impact of his conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.