Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has restored service connection for bilateral inguinal hernias, finding that the decision to sever it was not proper due to clear and unmistakable error in a prior rating decision.

The deciding factor: The RO improperly severed service connection based on CUE without meeting the high burden of proof required.

Claimed conditions
bilateral inguinal hernias
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
December 28, 2000
Citation
0033799

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0033799.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.