Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to inconsistencies in the appellant's service records and the need for further development, including verification of his reserve duty service prior to June 1987.

The deciding factor: The Board found that there were inconsistencies in the appellant's service records and required further action from the RO to verify his dates of active duty and active duty for training prior to June 1987.

Claimed conditions
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
December 29, 2000
Citation
0034081

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0034081.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.