The Board found that the appellant did not timely file a substantive appeal regarding the October 1996 rating actions, but she did timely file an appeal with regard to the July 23, 1997 administrative decision. The RO is instructed to review the additional evidence submitted by the appellant since the October 1997 Statement of the Case and readjudicate the issue of entitlement to unreimbursed medical expenses of the deceased veteran for 1994, 1995 and 1996.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the appellant did not timely file a substantive appeal regarding the October 1996 rating actions but she did timely file an appeal with regard to the July 23, 1997 administrative decision. The RO is instructed to review the additional evidence submitted by the appellant since the October 1997 Statement of the Case and readjudicate the issue.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2001
- Citation
- 0100330
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0100330.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.