The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected chronic lumbosacral strain warrants a 20 percent evaluation, which is higher than what he was previously granted. The disability currently manifests as pain, some limitation of motion, narrowing of disc space at L-5/S-1 on X-ray, and osteophyte formation.
The deciding factor: The veteran's lumbosacral strain has been shown to cause moderate limitation of motion, which is consistent with the current 20 percent rating assigned under Diagnostic Code 5292.
- Claimed conditions
- Stomach disability, Chronic lumbosacral strain
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- January 22, 2001
- Citation
- 0101571
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0101571.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an effective date prior to March 2, 2015, for TDIU was denied as the evidence did not show actual worsening within one year prior to his March 2, 2015, claim.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy disabilities prevented him from securing or following substantially gainful employment as of May 24, 2010.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder to include PTSD is granted. The claim for a stomach disability is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disabilities resulting from a September 2013 VA gastric sleeve surgery due to insufficient rationale in the medical opinions and unaddressed evidence that the gastric leak may have been present in December 2013. The TDIU claim was remanded as inextricably intertwined with the § 1151 claim pending its resolution.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.