The Board denied the claims for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for a gunshot wound to the left shoulder and for an effective date prior to January 30, 1990, for the grant of a 30 percent rating. The decision was based on the existing evidence and the reasonable exercise of judgment by the Board.
The deciding factor: The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in the initial evaluation or the effective date determination.
- Claimed conditions
- gunshot wound to the left shoulder, left median nerve injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2001
- Citation
- 0102268
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0102268.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected gunshot wound to the left shoulder was denied as his disability did not warrant a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining private treatment records from Dr. Laplac and the Hampton VAMC.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left median nerve injury based on aggravation during service. The case is remanded for further development, including obtaining medical records from Portsmouth Naval Hospital and providing the veteran with an examination to determine if his pre-existing condition was aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the veteran's increased rating claims for his service-connected conditions but denied reopening of his PTSD and schizophrenia claims due to lack of signed VA Form 9 submissions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.